this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
1219 points (97.3% liked)

Games

38748 readers
1998 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm mad about Ciri being the main character, however the reason I'm mad is not because of her character or her being a woman. What I'm upset about is that I thought this game would take place in a completely different time period or region. Like maybe during the first witchers? Maybe in the future? But no, CDPR is just force extending existing characters and a story that clearly ended. Zzzzz

[–] dink@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly my opinion as well, last game ended perfectly for a new story.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes. The games already retconned the ending of the books, which was pretty finalized. But whatever, the games were good. But now they're just force extending an already forced extended storyline rofl. I was hoping for completely new characters in a completely new settings/time period. Such a fucking shame.

They made such a big deal about the witcher 4 not being about Geralt and being it's own story, and now they're just extending Ciri's storyline. Pretty braindead decision in my opinion. It feels like they are just lazy and gave up on making a new character.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's risk aversion to some extent ?

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's the same bullshit that has ruined hollywood. It's safer to just reboot some bullshit or force a sequel vs. coming up with something new and original.

I'm not saying doing another Witcher game in general is a forced sequel. But using the same damn character is definitely a forced extension.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Quite the opposite for me. Having only random ass characters in the story would kill all my hype. Also I wished for Ciri as MC in the next game ever since I player W3, so for 10 years now.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My dream witcher game is set like 150 years in the future (early industrialized time period of the witcher universe.) And there could be tension as guns are invented and witchers aren't needed as much. How great would that be?

Wanted to mention - The Season of Storms Witcher book has a short flash forward to around 150 years in the future, and they're starting to burn fossil fuels or oil for fuel. That's where I got the 150 years.