this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
478 points (98.8% liked)

politics

23593 readers
4600 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 51 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

And yet we get banned for talking about the solution.

[–] bishbosh@lemm.ee 10 points 15 hours ago

Well that's the power of federation.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

We get banned for talking about increasing taxes on the wealthy through like progressive tax policy?

[–] TheShadow277@slrpnk.net 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Asking the rich to be less rich doesn't seem to be working so well to me.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

So how do we increase taxes on them when they control all our politicians?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 9 minutes ago

No politicians, no problem.

...I can't use a /s for this. Because, honestly, we might have a shooting war within a decade. I think most of our politicians don't understand why the social contract was a thing.

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub -2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Senseless killing is a superficial solution. Organization is the sustainable, but less glamurous one.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That won’t ever work in the US.

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Not with that attitude. Seems like MAGA succeeded in organizing sufficiently.

What are you gonna do? Kill all CEOs? And then? Kill all politicians? And then? Police? Military? Dissidents? Do you just keep killing? How do you handle the resulting societal trauma?

How exactly do you think any of that can achieve sustainable, progressive change?

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Whatever it takes, and peaceful solutions have proven ineffective for decades.

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub -1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Senseless killing is a superficial solution. Organization is the sustainable, but less glamorous one.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Untrue, naked violence has solved more conflicts in this world than anything else so yeah

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I agree with the premise, it just doesn't change anything. Change needs to be political, and as long as you keep the neoliberal fuckwits and fascists in power, there will always be enough parasites to fill the empty place.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Change needs to be cultural. So long as we live in our current cultural distinctions of "mine and thine" instead of some sort of collaborative being then this will keep on happening.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 hours ago

That flows directly from the bedrock of our culture which is "Your worth as a human is determined by the work you do in service of building wealth for those above you."