capital_sniff

joined 8 months ago
[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh these idiots are probably very likely going to spike crime in about a decade. It's been right around four-ish years since the abortion bans went into effect. So those unwanted children that are being force birthed will be young teens in about a decade. A bunch of poor unwanted teens living in localities that defunded all their social programs is probably not the anti crime kindling republicans think it be.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

It means they aren't serious people. The Trump administration wrecked up the country with their shitty dangerous response to covid and their conservative base spent the entire time complaining and attacking healthcare workers.

Serious people propose ways to address problems and work based off of facts. Conservatives are off on witch hunts and high on identity politics.

This election was a referendum on the neo-liberal order and it lost. Trump represents populist nationalism, if the transactional nature of his first term is any indicator he's gonna sell off as much as he can to the highest bidders.

TLDR: A bunch of angry working class folks just handed the country to the billionaire oligarchs, possibly under some delusion the wealthy won't keep robbing them blind.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

You are just describing the Federalist Society.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Tolerated... We got a major party ready to dismantle what little democracy we got. The GOP collectively lost their shit cause their orange gibbon lost 2020 and could handle it. So in 2024 they've doubled down on the geriatric man child.

If we get this wrong we should apologize to the King of England and rejoin the commonwealth.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Why complicate the onion by adding more layers? Why do we want a sovereign fund? Your solution just seems like another way to funnel more money to US corporations. We already let them switch to defined contribution 401k retirement funds. More money to companies public or private is just more money empowering little corporate fiefdoms.

We should simply tax these corporations and their owner class at a much higher rate. Take that money and fund social programs. For example, it is completely idiotic to have healthcare tied to employment and subsidizing it through the gov't.

If we removed corporate welfare from our system it would be really bad until something else took its place. We subsidize our entire food production system, removing that would drive up the cost of food. The Jones Act subsidizes our shipping industry. The price of drugs would also probably sky rocket the second you remove the public funding that goes into the early stage research.

And what happens to our military industrial complex when you remove corporate welfare?

The problem is we have Bezos playing rocket man and newspaper baron to the tune of three billion dollars a year. We have Musk fucking with our elections to the tune of some hundred million dollars a month. They have this money because we don't tax them. Tax that money away and they won't be fucking with shit.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Bill Gates the Microsoft guy? The one that just demolished competition? The same company that ran afoul of US antitrust law? Bill Gates the guy that had a non zero number of African nations ask him to stop helping, that guy?

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It'd be funny if it was just about grilling and craft beers with nothing spicier than a Full House (the original) joke, but I somehow doubt it.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean, I guess, but why complicate this stuff. We already have the systems and administration to do taxes. We could break up monopolies and enforce the laws we already have.

I'd keep it real real simple for folks. We should stop letting corporations and their owner class privatize the gains and stick the rest of society with the losses. Take the 2008 fiasco, if we are bailing out a bunch of companies we should be bailing out a bunch of home owners.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Very simply. Raise their taxes.

Less simply. Remove the cap on social security tax. Tax long term capital gains beyond a certain amount as regular income. Put the top rate income tax closer to 90%. Fix the god damn estate tax situation. Why on god's green earth do the children of Sam Walton occupy so much space on the Forbes 400.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I could see your scenario being scary if the "reasonable" GOP members and funders split off and started sucking all the "conservative" liberal groups that normally vote Democratic but could be swayed to embrace even more neo-liberal policies.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As long as there is a large concentration of a anti-education, anti-intellectual, and nationalistic brained people in easily gerrymandered areas there will probably always be a conservative party. The GOP has been playing their hateful scared brains like a fiddle for a good four plus decades, and they won't go quietly into the night.

Maybe if we didn't have a poorly planned two party system they'd have far less actual power.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Seeding the land for the next generation of American pickers?

 

If there was a game show like are you smarter than a fifth grader, but instead it is are you smarter than previous President George Bush Jr. and twice impeached previous President Trump is the first contestant would Trump win? So basically who is smarter the 43rd or 45th?

view more: next ›