this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
186 points (99.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6585 readers
294 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
186
Trump Orders Faster Build-Out of Nuclear Power Plants | Among a flurry of executive actions, Mr. Trump directed the nation’s nuclear safety regulator to speed up approvals for new reactors. (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 2 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
113 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It's worth noting that he also fired many of the staff who know how to ensure that they're actually safe, as well as the staff who would approve financing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

But what if AI collapses at some point? Approve a load of nuclear reactors and then AI collapses so we can use all that power for the good of humanity.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Why would we make excess power we have to discharge?

It's literally a waste of resources.

Maybe we should build housing and other things people actually need.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Countries that still use coal could turn those off thanks to the nuclear reactors

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I feel like you don't understand how spending money to produce extra cities worth of power that we then have to throw away is a bad idea.

Also building nuclear has nothing to do with AI