this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
601 points (98.9% liked)

Funny

14935 readers
877 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 54 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

If anybody's wondering... (Youtube link)

Also, ooof. Not that this looks to be a fine piece of cinema, but the writer didn't put this into the script, the director did. Apparently it's an 1884 printing of an 1853 edition of a 1720 translation (Pope's), so in no way whatsoever is it first edition of, well, anything. Maybe the worst part of it is that there was absolutely no reason to linger over the title. They never even say the name of the book.

[–] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

Someone in the props department snuck in a joke.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 7 points 11 months ago

The description says "psychological thriller", but the cinematography is giving me "Netflix romcom".