this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
857 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

70847 readers
3272 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived Link

A smartphone smuggled out of North Korea is offering a rare – and unsettling – glimpse into the extent of control Kim Jong Un's regime exerts over its citizens, down to the very words they type. While the device appears outwardly similar to any modern smartphone, its software reveals a far more oppressive reality. The phone was featured in a BBC video, which showed it powering on with an animated North Korean flag waving across the screen. While the report did not specify the brand, the design and user interface closely resembled those of a Huawei or Honor device.

It's unclear whether these companies officially sell phones in North Korea, but if they do, the devices are likely customized with state-approved software designed to restrict functionality and facilitate government surveillance.

One of the more revealing – and darkly amusing – features was the phone's automatic censorship of words deemed problematic by the state. For instance, when users typed oppa, a South Korean term used to refer to an older brother or a boyfriend, the phone automatically replaced it with comrade. A warning would then appear, admonishing the user that oppa could only refer to an older sibling.

Typing "South Korea" would trigger another change. The phrase was automatically replaced with "puppet state," reflecting the language used in official North Korean rhetoric.

Then came the more unsettling features. The phone silently captured a screenshot every five minutes, storing the images in a hidden folder that users couldn't access. According to the BBC, authorities could later review these images to monitor the user's activity.

The device was smuggled out of North Korea by Daily NK, a Seoul-based media outlet specializing in North Korean affairs. After examining the phone, the BBC confirmed that the censorship mechanisms were deeply embedded in its software. Experts say this technology is designed not only to control information but also to reinforce state messaging at the most personal level.

Smartphone usage has grown in North Korea in recent years, but access remains tightly controlled. Devices cannot connect to the global internet and are subject to intense government surveillance.

The regime has reportedly intensified efforts to eliminate South Korean cultural influence, which it views as subversive. So-called "youth crackdown squads" have been deployed to enforce these rules, frequently stopping young people on the streets to inspect their phones and review text messages for banned language.

Some North Korean escapees have shared that exposure to South Korean dramas or foreign radio broadcasts played a key role in their decision to flee the country. Despite the risks, outside media continues to be smuggled in – often via USB sticks and memory cards hidden in food shipments. Much of this effort is supported by foreign organizations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)

does anyone really think our freedom phones are far from this?

Maybe the western world can be given some credit on being a tad more subtle, but overall the difference here are in tecnique, not goals

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's why laws like the GDPR exist to prevent this bullshit.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

GDPR

Does not exist in Murica

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago

But it does in the EU and similar laws exist in other countries. I can do nothing about the corruption in the states

Ps. it does exist in Amerika

[–] Spectrism@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not completely, but the Brussels effect still applies to some degree.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Did not know about that... thanks for the link

[–] foxacid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

GDPR does not prevent foreign intelligence agencies from profiling you

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you have a link to what foreign intelligence agencies you mean cause than I am going to use my right to be forgotten. Cause yea that will work.

[–] foxacid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Any SIGINT agency that deals with foreign intelligence is likely to have most of your deepest darkest secrets. The ones with most media coverage are NSA and GCHQ. Looking it up isn't likely to yield very insightful results, other than perhaps some queer documents leaked by Snowden

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 0 points 21 hours ago

Probably not considering I live in a generally low risk country (NL) and they can't have something that doesn't exist. International intelligence in GDPR countries generally goes through the own countries government unless there are signs that they cannot be trusted.

And they will be really wary of using illegally obtained data on somebody in NL since that will cause for a lot of attention on them and probably issues. So even if they have relevant data they should be hesitant of using it.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Its funny, a screenshot every 5 minutes that might be reviewed later on if needed sounds less intrusive than western efforts like google, amazon, etc.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Tracking someone's history through screenshots sounds like a fucking nightmare for the person doing the searching.

It's evil, but also a PITA for the analyst.

[–] Zealousideal_Fox_900@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What kind of tankie bullshit argument is that lmao

[–] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

Eh, they didn’t exactly paint it in a good light. It’s more like not laughing too much at the ordinary NK citizen’s big brother plight while the rest of us are being monitored constantly and much more real time.

The two situations are not the same, but the parallels show his we all deal with this crap in our own ways.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

A factually accurate one lol

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, because here in the capitalist USA I am free to choose what phone and carrier I use, and what OS and software my phone have on them. The free market decided that I should have access to bootloader unlockable phones with open source OS and zero shitty Facebook apps spying on me.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tell me you are blind to privilege without telling me you are blind to privilege...

I get what you are saying but claiming that Capitalism and the Free Market got you there is laughable.

A shit ton of people in the USA do not actually have a choice in carrier and choice of phone seriously depends on how rich you are, the spread is wide!

More importantly, how many people do you think have the tech knowledge (or access to pay) to get an open source OS in their phones?