this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Meta (lemm.ee)

4062 readers
1 users here now

lemm.ee Meta

This is a community for discussion about this particular Lemmy instance.

News and updates about lemm.ee will be posted here, so if that's something that interests you, make sure to subscribe!


Rules:


If you're a Discord user, you can also join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/XM9nZwUn9K

Discord is only a back-up channel, !meta@lemm.ee will always be the main place for lemm.ee communications.


If you need help with anything, please post in !support instead.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is my current understanding of the situation:

  • The admins are no longer interested in running the instance, due to increasing demand, missing moderation features and waves of abuse from external actors.
  • Transferring the instance to someone else is a complicated issue. Even though there is not a large amount of private information in Lemmy's database, you can not simply transfer the trust the users placed in the original admin to the new owner.
  • Lemmy still does not provide an easy way to migrate accounts

Given all the above, shutting down the instance seems to be the natural course of action. I'd like to propose an alternative: freeze the instance activity and keep it in some form of "read-only" mode until Lemmy matures.

What would that require?

  1. Take the instance down (no more incoming activities)
  2. Run a script that generates static json files for every actor (user, community), federated object (post, comment, report) and activity (like/dislike votes, announce activities, etc)
  3. Set up a static site to serve all that JSON.
  4. Take the media on pict-rs and move to some long-term back up system.
  5. (Optional, but could be helpful in the future) allow users to checkout the private keys of their own user and community actors.

This won't help solve the current problems and it wouldn't help with the users who now will have to move away to a new instance, but it could eventually help for users who want to restore the activity on a new server.

I've been experimenting with an implementation for Decentralized Identifiers for ActivityPub that can make it possible for people to move servers but maintain their identity (similar to bluesky's PLC directory), so perhaps we could have a future where users can fully migrate their accounts from server to server without requiring intervention from admins.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lily33@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The issue is that currently we don't have the technical features needed for such an attitude: namely, transfering the communities. Decentralised IDs would also help.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, again... unpopular opinion but just embrace the transience. How necessary is "transferring" a community. There's very few communities with content that provides some kind of reference.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly.

If you're making posts or comments that you want preserved, you should be backing them up anyway.

It would be nice if the export function copied saved items as well as subs and blocks though.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago

It does? I have no clue how I missed that. Thank you very much