People Twitter

10295 readers

858 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1826

In the end, The Hill lied and Harris was right. (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Loduz_247@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

359 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Link https://archive.ph/lk6HY

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was an opinion piece by a guest columnist.

Who is a piece of shit, but regardless.

https://books.google.com/books/about/Outrage_Inc.html

he is derekahunter on siteformerlyknownasbirdsite

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was an opinion piece by a guest columnist.

That an editor then chose to publish. What's your point?

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nearly every respectable major news outlet that has commentary tries to invite commentary from multiple sides. They also probably didn't know what he would become or his ulterior motives.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nearly every respectable major news outlet that has commentary tries to invite commentary from multiple sides.

Maybe that's part of the issue though?

If Jimmy Allred says it’s raining, and W. Lee O’Daniel says it isn’t raining, Texas newspapermen quote them both, and don’t look out the window to see which is lying, and to tell the readers what the truth is at the moment.

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I'm really torn on that. Because I want media to be unbiased, but I also want media to tell the truth.

Most media will simply report the truth of what other people say is the truth.

I suppose I'd opt for unbias over bias if those were the two options.