637
Ever-rising height of car bonnets a ‘clear threat’ to children, report says
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
637 points (98.5% liked)
Fuck Cars
12121 readers
1943 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, smaller cars are less of an issue on every metric. They take away less space, they are less dangerous to other people, they have lower emissions (unless they are decades older), someone buying a smaller car will more likely have bought it for utility rather than status reasons...
We shouldn't let perfect be the enemy of better.
Unless they're kei cars in an area with special zoning laws mandating half-size parking spaces for them, all cars take up the same amount of space at rest: one parking space each.
In motion, the space cars take up is dominated by following distance, not the length of the vehicle itself, so small cars don't meaningfully increase the capacity of the road either.
In other words, from an urban design/engineering perspective, all cars are effectively the same size. The only things that get considered separately are the really big vehicles, like firetrucks, buses, and 18-wheelers.
As for the other aspects: yes, small cars are better, but it's a marginal gain rather than a transformational one. In this space, of all places, I prefer to focus on those transformational gains rather than preemptively compromising. Remember, a radical flank is always necessary in order to make the moderate position look moderate. You can't shift the Overton window without demanding more than you expect to get.
I wish all cars only took up one space. It's extremely common to see large ass trucks unable to fit in driveways, so their ass end hangs out into bike lanes.
And it's also common to see large ass trucks taking up 2 (or more) parking spaces in parking lots.
And in parking spots in front of stores (i.e. in a plaza), the front end hangs into the walking space of pedestrians.
Like trying to fit a large boat in a backyard swimming pool! They are too big for regular use.