this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
823 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

71396 readers
3673 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to the comments r/europe_sub and r/canada_sub might be involved as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 157 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Setting aside the veritable TITAN-loads of shady shit Palsntir is up to, it's also worth noting that Reddit's policy changes have made it clear that providing a platform for the spread of disinformation is a central part of its current business model, so I'd assume that not only is Palantir using it for that purpose, but that they are far from alone.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just waiting for Thiel to buy Reddit.

[–] conicalscientist@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thiel funded reddit. He's had his hands in it since 2014.

Damn, I forgot about that somehow. I hate this timeline.

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He probably already bought it through private equity.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

spez might sell it to musk instead.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago

half of its already bots, so im not surprised and it usually the propaganda bots keeping up the engagements. Also i heard reddit wants to make thier post/account history mroe private so its harder to discern a bot.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Reddit’s policy changes have made it clear that providing a platform for the spread of disinformation is a central part of its current business model

I left reddit years ago, what are these policy changes that you're talking about and how do they relate to spreading "disinformation"?

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My take: removing API access and banning mods who protested saying that this would centralize tooling (removing 3p access), plus banning users who mentioned Musk or Luigi as "violent" are clear indicators that they are disinformation sympathetic, despite the primarily "left wing" seeming content that remains. Also a lot of promoted content is disinformation, as can be seen in minutes of browsing.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

plus banning users who mentioned Musk or Luigi as “violent”

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the new rule to remove and/or ban any comment or person who calls for violence against specific people? I wouldn't really say that's "disinformation sympathetic". Even if it's what you originally said, how does that have anything to do with "providing a platform for the spread of disinformation"?

Also a lot of promoted content is disinformation

Promoted content as in ads?

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Officially yes. I got banned for saying "Musk fuming is violently toxic", site wide and permanently from 6 subreddits. Others got banned just saying "Luigi is innocent". Try it out. That reads more like quashing free speech to me.

Disinformation in the ads, yes. Also front page stuff making past moderation. Today in r/science I saw "Democrats are less tolerant of Republicans than vice versa" and a load of unscientific hogwash saying Republicans are not as intolerant as Democrats think. Go find it yourself if you don't believe me.

That seems like a platform of disinformation to me.

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, usually people don't say "I am disinforming you, hah!". We can only rely on that weird feeling that something isn't right. That's what makes it so pernicious compared to plain good faith misinformation.

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you interpret from the words "policy changes" but they dont usually refer to a weird feeling.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Funny that's exactly the zeitgeist of 1930s Germany.