this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
458 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

15172 readers
1797 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hm, that doesn't sound absolute

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not, but it has some flavor to it. But 100 is a bit much.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We can compromise - 95. That seems like a good number if you really want to proof things right. You want at least 95.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know that leaves 5P less. I feel like we need a P closer to 0.

How about if we just define that P=NP?