politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Y’all need to let this fantasy go. He won. It fucking sucks but he did.
I'm not so sure, but sadly our constitution doesn't have a mechanism to rewind anyway. All we could do is impeach and remove him, and then just keep impeaching and removing successors until we get someone sane.
Personally, I'm for a constitutional amendment to fix this, but it'll never happen.
Ok then show the homework. All I ever see is “the swings were too big.” Trump is a piece of shit unfit for the presidency but he won at the ballot box so here we are
I'm waiting for the results of the lawsuits. I said "I'm not so sure," but that doesn't mean I think the election was stolen, either. It means I'm not certain either way.
But it doesn't really matter either way. Say ironclad evidence comes out that he stole the election; we have no means to walk it back.
Man name your bet - the lawsuits won’t get anywhere and nothing of the remotest interest will come from this. It’s a desperate Hail Mary. There is nothing indicating a fraudulent election. Let’s not be as pathetic as the MAGA crowd with this shit
"Winning by cheating" is NOT equal to "winning".
Yeah no shit lol but what evidence is there of cheating? Yall sound like MAGA. Still not a single claim or link, just “he didn’t win.”
Published yesterday. June 14, 2025 at 1:39pm
Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruled last month that the allegations from SMART Legislation, the action arm of nonpartisan watchdog SMART Elections, were substantial enough to advance to discovery.
“There is clear evidence that the Senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely,” SMART Legislation founder and executive director Lulu Friesdat said in a statement published by the Associated Press.
https://www.westernjournal.com/lawsuit-alleges-secretly-altered-vote-machines-stole-election-kamala-harris/
So a single judge yesterday decided it warrants further investigation. Is that what this says?
The statement by the head of the group putting forth the lawsuit is definitely not what’s important here
I just want to be very clear about what we are saying here because what I’ve seen so far is “Trump cheated and stole the election.“