this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
230 points (99.6% liked)

politics

30914 readers
2090 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. Senate Republican leaders expressed confidence Tuesday they’ll be able to tamp down opposition to various elements of the party’s “big, beautiful bill” in time to approve the measure before the Fourth of July, though they acknowledged there’s considerable work left to do.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ive tried for years to convince themselves knuckle draggers all while they wish me nothing but the worst for wanting things like universal Healthcare and equality. I smile everytime I see a story like this. Evil people need to feel the consequences of their actions.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like they convinced you instead. Because taking pleasure in the misery of others is precisely what they're all about.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Taking pleasure in the (self inflicted) suffering of others, but voting for and supporting policy change to fix that suffering seems very different from actively participating in the increase of suffering of others.

Not everyone has to be as holy as thou to not be evil.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a pretty damn thin line, and a recipe for hypocrisy while you're at it.

No, abandoning your empathy is not gonna lead anywhere good.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A tolerant society can't tolerate intolerance. Fuck'em.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. But abandoning your empathy is a great way to become one of the intolerant ones. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There can be no empathy for intolerance, none.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Ok. Never said that.

[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And now you've become a piece of what you hate.