Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
view the rest of the comments
As much as we want to get angry at the car brains for this, it's not the reason he's been told to stop:
Yeah, can't write it down directly that he can't high five.
The complaint of "distracted children" didn't come from the police, it came from drivers who had to wait those "10 seconds" - but not bcs of the wait, def bcs of how it affects the children (who forget why the crossing guard is there & have convos about philosophy & art??).
And even at that it seems more parents agree with high-fiving than are opposed - so you know it was just one bitchy municipal official who lives nearby & just hates everything & everyone.
Engaging with children (who for some reason still wouldn't get the importance of careful crossing) might be more of a benefit imho - the guard can then point out to kids who didn't pay enough attention what they (could have) missed. You know, so they learn that its a constant thing & that the mere knowledge of it (what to answer when someone asks them) isn't enough.
Otherwise the "guard" could just be just an umbrella holder with a sign.
(I'm sure the guard def didn't go like: "Hey, kid, look at me, no, don't look left or right, just concentrate on me & start walking forward! And think of an elaborate secret high five manoeuvre that lasts for 10 seconds & that I'll def remember!")
But drivers often do get inpatient at the delay of 10 seconds & it fucks their whole day up.
It's not like this kids hold up traffic for 30 minutes every day.
that's still car-brained, how fucked is it that kids are supposed to concentrate on crossing the street? that's not how things used to be, kids used to run in front of trams and all it resulted in was a slightly annoyed tram driver!
I dont think its out of order to teach kids to be aware for one of the most dangerous things they will do (crossing a road) for the 20 seconds or so they are doing it.
the fucked up thing is that CROSSING A FUCKING ROAD is one of the most dangerous things they will do, obviously.
Yes it is, but pointing that out doesnt change the fact that it is so and people have to deal with the world as it is not how they would like it to be.