this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
1139 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

12223 readers
2724 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The tables on the road were only there for the inauguration day, but bike lane is here to stay.

https://www.lavoixdunord.fr/1596032/article/2025-06-14/lomme-apaise-securise-et-cyclable-le-bourg-renove-prefigure-l-avenue-de

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

If something I wrote is upsetting when taken out of context, you might want to put it back in. World might be a nicer place.

"There should be safe places for people to walk."

[–] YouShouldSeeMyAlt@lemmy.zip -5 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

There should be safe places for people to walk, however my example is of such a place (like the bike path in the picture) being made unsafe for people walking by bicycles (the inverse of what's pictured).

In normal communities on Lemmy this could spark discussion but on FuckCars you're all so fragile you have to brigade anyone who doesn't fall in line with your specific viewpoint.

Clearly my mistake for not blocking this community when I created this alt.

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

People here legit agreeing there should be safe and equitable access to public infrastructure.

You're off on the sidelines complaining that there isn't safe and equitable access to public infrastructure.

People aren't downvoting your opinion, just your reading comprehension.

[–] Transform0273@lemm.ee 4 points 9 hours ago

If I understand you correctly:

There's a picture of a place that used to be a road, but is now an area where people can walk (on both left and right sides), sit, and bike. Someone complained about a pedestrian on the bike lane, and you responded by describing a situation in a completely different place. When people disliked your response, you then complained about their reactions.

Honestly, I find this confusing and not very helpful, as it doesn't contribute meaningfully to the discussion about the original picture. Did I miss something? I'm a bit tired right now, so please let me know if that's the case.