this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
1135 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

12223 readers
2693 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The tables on the road were only there for the inauguration day, but bike lane is here to stay.

https://www.lavoixdunord.fr/1596032/article/2025-06-14/lomme-apaise-securise-et-cyclable-le-bourg-renove-prefigure-l-avenue-de

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iglou@programming.dev 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It depends on the type of tiles you use. Paris has a lot of tiled roads in pedestrian centric areas, they've been there for decades and are not more damaged than asphalt. They're changed every 15 years or so, from my experience living with a neigbborhood like this nearby.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Every 15 years is terrible for road length, you’re kinda proving my point. Costly replacement too. It just doesn’t work for any type of road that needs to carry loads.

Or any place with extreme weather, or a lot of rain, or etc.

Tiles aren’t for heavy traffic.

[–] iglou@programming.dev -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but that doesn't make them not viable for pedestrian centric areas. The point isn't durability or low cost, it's enjoying a city center.

And they're not replaced because they're broken, they're replaced because they turn ugly.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Shops can use a rug, there’s lot more efficient, durable and less costly options that provide the same or better.

They break, and they’re ugly from wear. They’re worn because they’re not the right material for the use case. And no one wants to cart a hand dolly on broken tile. You’re really doing a fantastic job giving more reasons why tile shouldn’t be used when heavy loads are anticipated……

[–] iglou@programming.dev 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

And yet the trend in cities like Paris is to move to these type of roads instead of asphalt... You should call them, tell them they're wasting their money

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Because they likely have alleys that delivery vans go down, I already addressed that in my first comment ;)

It’s almost like people probably are using g the best material for the situation since you know, they live there and designed it =D

Being a smart ass doesn’t work when your “opinion” was already covered by the person you responded to.