this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1014 points (99.7% liked)

News

30463 readers
3687 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo conceded New York City’s Democratic mayoral primary to Zohran Mamdani as the 33-year old member of the state Assembly had a significant lead in the race Tuesday night.

Cuomo’s concession came as the race’s outcome will be decided by a ranked choice count after neither Democrat got a clear majority in the vote.

Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist member of the state Assembly, started to pull ahead with more than an estimated 80% of ballots counted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 187 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Thank fuck

Hopefully he wins the general

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 46 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 71 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (6 children)

Wtf happened to Adams? Sure, he was under criminal corruption indictments, then cozied up to Trump and got "pardoned" (charges dismissed). But then he was supposed to be on the Democratic primary ballot, his picture was even in the official voter guide from a month ago, but on election day his name wasn't even in the list? Now he's apparently running as independent incumbent instead? What a booger!

EDIT: Both Cuomo and Adams are intending to run as independent in the general? WhyTF do we even have primaries then! If they are not going to play by their own rules of their special little club, let's just extend Ranked Choice Voting to cover the general and scrap the primaries altogether!

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This is the dream of ranked choice. The more candidates the better.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Don't understand why it wasn't done this way in the first place. RCV was approved as a New York City Charter amendment by a voter initiative in 2019, but only applies to primary city elections, not general. You'd think procedurally it would be easier to justify altering the general election process that the Constitution actually applies to, rather than what is technically internal business of independent private organizations (the Democratic and the Republican parties).

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

I don’t realize it wouldn’t be in the main election. If so, then Cuomo better not run… Maybe they do it like this as a stepping stone. Get everybody used to the process in the primaries before rolling it out to the main.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 52 points 21 hours ago

WhyTF do we even have primaries then! If they are not going to play by their own rules of their special little club, let’s just extend Ranked Choice Voting to cover the general and scrap the primaries altogether!

Because the US doesn't really have a true democracy. It's always going to be weighted against the actual interests of the people. The more success candidates the Zohran have, the more the established politicians will stack the deck against them. The good thing is that the more the game is rigged the more obvious it all becomes.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

centrists are still the wing of puma pac.

And they had the temerity to say "no matter who" for three fucking election cycles.

[–] mikezeman@lemmy.zip 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The article says Adams is running as an independent, and that Cuomo has the option and is looking into it! It's not decided.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 19 points 21 hours ago

He's probably trying to save face; he's on record in May saying he's running no matter the result of the primary.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago

adams is running to daddy-trump.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

WhyTF do we even have primaries then!

So progressives don't get any ideas. As I said elsewhere in the thread: I better not hear another liberal saying we can't split the vote again.

[–] lost@lemmy.wtf 5 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I assume you mean in reference to the general last year? I raged against the way the left brought disaster upon the Palestinians despite their best intentions. This outcome, however, is exactly what I argued the left should be doing: fight FOR the left in primaries, vote AGAINST fascists in the general. You are damn close to sham elections as it is, giving the facisits any opportunity to shut down democracy is self defeating.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I assume you mean in reference to the general last year?

That's the most recent example, yes, but you get this spiel whenever you suggest going against the party in anything beyond local elections.

I raged against the way the left brought disaster upon the Palestinians despite their best intentions.

Where are you getting the idea that it was the left that let Trump win? Democrat non-voters were for the most part moderates.

fight FOR the left in primaries, vote AGAINST fascists in the general.

The whole point of this mantra is to not split the anti-fascist vote. And what are the Democrats doing now after not getting their way? Ignore the primary and split the anti-fascist vote. The whole point of not splitting the vote is defeated when the liberals then decide to split the vote. I'm also very much not convinced that a vote for Democrats is a vote against fascism given that they just voted not to impeach Trump.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Where are you getting the idea that it was the left that let Trump win? Democrat non-voters were for the most part moderates.

no centrist has ever cared. they don't want to move to the left under any circumstances, so they blame the left every time their unpopular policies, refusal to represent anyone but themselves, cowardice, and complicity lose them elections.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

fight FOR the left in primaries, vote AGAINST fascists in the general

That's how it should have worked, except that in the 2024 Democratic Presidential primary, when Biden was the only name on the ballot, we were STILL told to vote for him and only him or we'd be supporting Trump. In the primary! Voters in Michigan tried to campaign for "uncommitted" option in protest of the ongoing genocide in Gaza and how the administration was ignoring it, and they were crucified by establishment Democrats. Even Bernie Sanders distanced himself from the protest vote, saying to vote Biden no matter what. In the primaries!

[–] lost@lemmy.wtf 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The way Democrats run primaries is shameful, no denying it. But the only way to change the dems is to get actively involved, push for RCV, start grass roots, and, yes, vote for the good guy in the primary.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

and, yes, vote for the good guy in the primary.

when the party deigns to have them.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

The rules for primaries are clear. Anyone can run in them if they get the signatures.

If you don't like the candidates that's fine but Democrats individually decided not to run against Biden.

The party can't stop them.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

As I said elsewhere in the thread: I better not hear another liberal saying we can't split the vote again.

Do you actually understand the difference between FPTP and ranked choice?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 23 points 20 hours ago

They're talking about the general election, which is FPTP, and losing primary moderates refusing the result and trying again in the general.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 16 points 20 hours ago

The NYC general is FPTP, and Cuomo is running anyway despite having lost the primary. Neither me nor the other person are criticizing anyone for running in the primary.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Do you actually understand the voting process you're commenting on?

EDIT: I'll take that as saying the same thing as the others above me as a "No, I don't get what I'm commenting on, everyone is wrong but me."