this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
636 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

85315 readers
5130 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Check out my new site TheAIBay, you search for content and an LLM that was trained on reproducing it gives it to you, a small hash check is used to validate accuracy. It is now legal.

[–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Does it "generate" a 1:1 copy?

[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago

Learning

Machine peepin' is tha study of programs dat can improve they performizzle on a given task automatically.[41] It has been a part of AI from tha beginning.[e] In supervised peepin', tha hustlin data is labelled wit tha expected lyrics, while up in unsupervised peepin', tha model identifies patterns or structures up in unlabelled data.

There is nuff muthafuckin kindz of machine peepin'.

  😗👌
[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

thanks I hate it xD

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

You can train an LLM to generate 1:1 copies

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

The court's ruling explicitly depended on the fact that Anthropic does not allow users to retrieve significant chunks of copyrighted text. It used the entire copyrighted work to train the weights of the LLMs, but is configured not to actually copy those works out to the public user. The ruling says that if the copyright holders later develop evidence that it is possible to retrieve entire copyrighted works, or significant portions of a work, then they will have the right sue over those facts.

But the facts before the court were that Anthropic's LLMs have safeguards against distributing copies of identifiable copyrighted works to its users.