this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
592 points (97.4% liked)

News

30616 readers
4031 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please explain how they removed the ability to challenge it.

Also, they are still going to make a decision. Just haven’t done it yet.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please explain your current understanding of the ruling in full before you ask others for lengthy explanations.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I asked you first. So annoying.

Here ya go: The ruling is against universal injunctions. Any existing injunctions stay and any future plaintiffs can block the order as well. It just can’t be stopped across the country from any existing or future rulings. Unless of course the Supreme Court ends up saying it’s unconstitutional.

Your turn.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

And you don't see the blindingly obvious problems with that, the issues that have been repeatedly pointed out in dozens of articles on the subject? I'm sorry, but you just aren't operating in good faith. You're either willfully ignoring those issues, or you are demanding others do your homework for you.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So you don’t have an answer to my question? Sounds like you’re the one operating blindly. Just saying things.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

No, I just don't suffer fools.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Look, I don't know why you have such piss-poor critical thinking skills and a complete lack of any ability to read the voluminous coverage on the subject.

But the entire reason Trump wanted this ruling was because it would make it easier to trample people's rights. Without national injunctions, your rights do not exist. This is especially true for immigration. The Trump admin is also fighting to be able to deport people without due process, and you're already not entitled to representation during immigration procedures.

What portion of immigrants can afford a lawyer? If you're a low-income US citizen, and Trump decides to revoke your citizenship, what exactly is your plan? Yes, you have citizenship from birth, but that doesn't matter. Trump has decided to just fucking ignore the Constitution entirely. And yes, in theory, you can sue the admin in court, but good luck with that. If you can even afford a lawyer, by the time you find one, you'll already be on a plane to Sudan.

How are you so dense that you can't realize that the entire point of Trump pursuing this is that he wants to remove from people the ability to challenge his illegal actions? There's literally no other reason to do this. If you live in the US, you have seen your own rights massively curtailed by this ruling. But you're either too stupid to realize that, or you're just happy that you're not likely to be at the front of the line of people being fed into the meat grinder.

Don't link to a massive ruling and tell people "just read it" you fucking goober.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Are you okay? What’s really bothering you? It’s not about the ruling. I can tell it’s something else. I’m being genuine. You can DM me.