NBA - Main

12 readers

2 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@nba.space

If you replaced Jamal Murray with Trae Young would the Nuggets be better or worse? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by BigDaddyJuno@alien.top to c/nba@nba.space

161 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Basically the title. Replace Murray with Trae. Contracts stay the same. Are the Nuggets better or worse now? I’m talking about Trae Young of the Atlanta Hawks by the way

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RatLord445@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

1-Cutting was never something that jamal murray is good at and certainly not something he’s better than trae

2-Do you see the jokic/Murray PnR?, Murray handles the ball 90% of the time and in an inverted PNR we have 0 evidence that trae would be worse than murray in that simply because HE NEVER PLAYED WITH SOMEONE LIKE JOKIC

3-BY FAR THE WORST ASPECT ABOUT THE NUGGETS IS HOW GODAWFUL THE NON-JOKIC MINUTES ARE, Whenever its just murray on rhe court without jokic the nuggets’ offense is a stagnant fucking mess where just chucks some bs contested shots and dribbles the ball for 90% of the shotclock, Having trae young on the court while resting jokic????? The team would go 16-0 this year, not to mention that trae on that nuggets team without jokic is ideal for him as well

I feel like im going crazy seeing people praise jamal murray like this lol