The ban comes after Al Jazeera presented a well-documented report suggesting that Israel was responsible for the attack on Al-Ahli Hospital.
On Friday, the Israeli Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi announced the closure of the Qatari news network Al Jazeera.
This decision was justified by citing new policies that allow the temporary shutdown of foreign media outlets in case of emergencies. In this instance, Israel views Al Jazeera as a pro-Islamic and pro-Palestinian media organization.
"Al Jazeera's broadcasts and reports constitute incitement against Israel. Their propaganda supports Hamas, the Islamic State, and other terrorist organizations, promoting violence against Israel," Karhi stated.
Approved by the Defense Ministry, currenty Israeli policies empower the Communications ministry to order any media outlet to cease broadcasting and publishing content, as well as to close their offices and seize their equipment.
"The closure of the Al Jazeera network in Israel follows the presentation of evidence that it aids the enemy, disseminates propaganda in the service of Hamas in Arabic and English to viewers worldwide, and even provides sensitive information to our adversaries."
"Israel is at war on land, in the air, at sea, and on the front of public diplomacy. We will not tolerate broadcasts that threaten the security of the State," Karhi declared, emphasizing that the measure will be valid for 30 days and may be extended for an additional 30 days.
The ban on Al Jazeera comes after the media outlet presented a well-documented report suggesting that the Israeli armed forces were responsible for the attack on Al-Ahli Hospital, which resulted in the deaths of nearly 500 Palestinians. The Al Jazeera report also disputed the claim that the Palestinian resistance was behind the aggression.
I'm disappointed that you're replicating the flawed asymmetric standards of Israel in this conversation. I've linked to sources for my statements, but you've made controversial claims while putting the burden on me to find what sources you're using to bolster your confidence. If your goal is to signify your 'team,' this conversation is over. If you would like to try and build a shared reality where we can agree on facts, your lack of respect for me is harming that goal.
You are the one treating this like football teams with your whataboutism re the Israeli newspaper.
Nevertheless I responded by saying I doubt Israeli newspapers are better but you ignore that part.
And you characterised the g20 report slip-up as commendable because in your mind they deliberately planted the truth as an Easter Egg for internet sleuths.
I doubt I am in a discussion with someone who is impartial here. Blocked. No need to aggravate each other further.