this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
-112 points (19.9% liked)

Memes

52660 readers
589 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Man, you and I both know Russia is not there to kill Nazis. Yeah there are Nazis in Ukraine but this is not a materialist understanding of the conflict and you know it. Ukrainian Nazis did not pose an existential threat to Russia. Russia attacked Ukraine because it saw NATO expansion in the region as a threat. It labeled this as a redline numerous times. The Nazi thing is convenient but liberals don't even like fighting nazis. You aren't going to convince anyone of anything like this. Why agitate in this way? What is the point?

I see your posts often and they have always perplexed me. Why use RT as a source on this conflict? Yeah it shows the other side of the war but just like western news on this issue it too is an arm of propaganda. I just can't see you changing any minds or naturally fostering a materialist understanding in this manner

[โ€“] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Reality is more nuanced than the way you are presenting it. Yes, NATO expansion is the existential threat that justifies Russia's mobilization, both in 2014 and in 2022.

However, the state sanctioned neo-nazi mass murder of ethnic Russians in the Donbass and the subsequent calls for help and referendums are critical components because of the UN charter. There is legal cover for the invasion due to that situation and it's is a very important part of the complex of actions.

It's also critical to fight against empire on multiple fronts, and one of those is on the propaganda front. Maintaining the constant reminder of the violence of the state sanctioned neo-Nazis is a critical component in countering imperial propaganda.

Don't try to reduce things down to a single cause. That's not dialectical. It's what we call "vulgar materialism".

[โ€“] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yes I know its more complex I just didn't have the desire to elaborate on that point, I was drunk and more focused on what I saw as terrible agitprop. I saw NATO expansion as a primary cause. The existence of Nazis and the crimes they commit are reprehensible but I don't think Russia actually cares about the victims. It is primarily a useful tool of legal and public legitimacy.

[โ€“] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 months ago

Why is it your belief that Russia doesn't care about the victims? Do you believe Russia is driven without any sense of humanity and empathy?

Besides, as far as we know, nation-states don't have the mechanisms for emotions. It's the people in the nation-states that have them. I assure you that many people in Russia have empathy for the victims of the neo-nazis in Ukraine.

No, Russia's state actions are not primarily driven by empathy but not a single nation-state has ever met that standard, so why is that the lens you are using here?

The fact that the neo-nazi angle is useful in the legal and legitimacy spaces is sufficient for it to be a valid position.

[โ€“] papalonian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I just can't see you changing any minds or naturally fostering a materialist understanding in this manner

They aren't trying to do either, they want to rage bait people into debating them so they can le epically SMASH them with facts and logic.