this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

14 readers
2 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
communick@nba.space
1
If you replaced Jamal Murray with Trae Young would the Nuggets be better or worse? (alien.top)
submitted 1 year ago by BigDaddyJuno@alien.top to c/nba@nba.space
161 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Basically the title. Replace Murray with Trae. Contracts stay the same. Are the Nuggets better or worse now? I’m talking about Trae Young of the Atlanta Hawks by the way

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] seeker_of_knowledge@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are just dismissing the cutting aspect, but Murray and Jokic have probably the best cutter-passer connection of anyone in the league. Jamal eats off of cuts and opens up a lot of the offense with those actions. Taking that away hamstrings the top end upside of what the Nuggets do.

[–] silliputti0907@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Nuggets are better with Murray cutting, but they are also fine without it. There are other players that cut. IMO Young would make up for that with everything else. Numbers point to Murray being a better shooter, but it doesn't take account for the degree of difficulty and focus Murray faces vs Trae. Playing with Jokic, means you will get open shots and easy looks.