this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
99 points (98.1% liked)

science

20312 readers
1137 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ubermeisters@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Simultaneously also I think

Edit: or maybe not

[–] neptune@dmv.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Really. Wouldn't broadcasting on all spectrums basically just be noise?

Edit: the article says "have broad tunability" which I take to mean that no, they just operate on one frequency at a time

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

It covers more frequencies as in wavelengths as in the bigger the wavelength the bigger the length of the antenna (to put it simply). In this case they're saying you wouldn't need to make it as large as a conventional antenna to receive the same frequencies, or you could make it large and receive more frequencies.

[–] ubermeisters@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hmm alright, maybe I misunderstood that part, I was thinking that meant ability to broadcast a gamut of signal.

[–] neptune@dmv.social 1 points 2 years ago

I do think it can receive on many frequencies at once. But I think the Fourier transform won't be able to untangle a signal if that signal is broadcast continuously on all frequencies.