this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
518 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

12894 readers
894 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

But an SUV carries at least 8 people and their luggage along with 3 to 6 thousand pounds of SUV...maybe if we made it electric and removed 2 to 5 thousand pounds, that could be interesting? A tandem electric bike, 2 tires, 8 people, huge efficiency! You just need to all be going to the same place.

I've always wondered if a minimalist monorail could ever happen. Imagine the freedom of a bike but you could ride say 20 people all together from one city to another carrying your bikes along. In Seattle you definitely want the outer covering of a gondola, but there are cities where you don't really need a shell.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I'll settle for a network of inter-city paved uninterrupted car-free "bike highways" between all cities with > 100,000 people. Just a single asphalt lane with no breaks and no cars flying around.

Pretty sure that's basic-tier shit in many European countries, but it'd be such a huge deal here.

[–] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 days ago

With a nice grade to flat...yes please!

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

an SUV carries at least 8 people

Damn, they ban single-occupancy SUVs where you live? That's great! And not even single-occupancy...sounds like you can't even drive them unless you have all the seats full.

I've never seen one with more than 8 seats. Where do the rest of the passengers go?

Sounds pretty efficient. 7 bikes generally can only transport 7 people!

[–] Drantak@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure you don't understand what "at least" means.

[–] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Normal use 1 person. Max use maybe at least 8?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most SUVs max out at 5 people; only the largest have a third row of seats.

Also, even those seat "at most" 8, not "at least" 8.

[–] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 days ago

OK at most then.

[–] Drantak@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"You use at least to say that a number or amount is the smallest that is possible or likely and that the actual number or amount may be greater."

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/at-least

Any car can carry at least 1 person.

[–] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 days ago

Fine fine. Potatoes potato. Tomatoes tornados.