this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
701 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2850 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Most of the world's biggest advertisers have stopped buying ads on Elon Musk's X, exclusive new data shows::Musk and X CEO Linda Yaccarino have recently stated that most of the company's top-spending advertisers from last year have returned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

Just hypothetically, jokes and feelings aside for discussion sake, if we assume Elon had a plan after taking over (whether he did it by mistake or whatever) what do you think it could be?

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 32 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Saudi Arabia felt Twitter was a problem, so they paid Elon to take it down in a way it wouldn't come back.

[–] Sarcastik@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would they "take it down" when anyone with even a modicum of business knowledge would assume a better replacement would be created and take it's place. This making the next version of Twitter even harder to control.

Taking it over and controlling the content on it is/was the smart play, especially if you're going to fork over the $ to buy it outright.

Stop trying to justify Elon's shit business decisions. He can just be a fucking moron that got lucky with a few strategic purchases.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, maybe a better replacement does come. But just like reddit, it takes a long time and not everyone will actually leave. Now like reddit, it's just full of BS and has fragmented the community. If the goal was to tear down a platform where people can organize while not fully killing it (preventing the immediate need for a replacement) then he's doing a good job.

Yes he could be just an idiot, but all throughout history evil men have done evil things and used their "ignorance" as an excuse. People calling you stupid is much easier to manage than people calling you evil.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

He can be stupid and evil

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if the goal is to collapse the business they would have done it a lot faster

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's more than destroy the business, it's to totally delegitimize the platform and flood it with people who would ruin any legit discourse.

ruin any legit discourse

That happened years before Elon bought it.

I wonder if they made the same arrangement with him to get him to ruin electric cars - and then were surprised when people kept buying Teslas anyway.

load more comments (12 replies)