this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

14 readers
2 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lets_talk_basketball@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (62 children)

I'll be honest tho, idk how him and Brunson works as a backcourt.

[–] drjisftw@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (39 children)

Nobody wants to hear this but Donovan will always be a flawed player as an undersized 2.

[–] FreddyAllstar@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Depends. I feel like him and Murray are very similar players. If you switch him with Murray, Jokic hides his flaws, while you would say the same things about Murray in Cleveland.

[–] AbelardsArdor@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Murray is a better defender than Donovan Mitchell. He's more physical, tougher, and can hang on bigger guys on switches periodically. He also doesnt get caught out of position or on closeouts nearly as often as Mitchell does (just go watch the Dallas series again, or even the Knicks series last year - Donovan Mitchell is not a good defensive player. Jamal Murray is).

Jamal is also a better passer than Donovan Mitchell. He just averaged 10+ assists in the Finals against the consensus best coach in the NBA. Donovan has improved as a passer, but I would be FLOORED if he ever averaged 10 assists in a playoff series.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments (59 replies)