this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

1 readers
1 users here now

A place to politely discuss the tools, technique and culture of photography.

This is not a good place to simply share cool photos/videos or promote your own work and projects, but rather a place to discuss photography as an art and post things that would be of interest to other photographers.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

[removed]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemlurker@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

You're self contradiction somewhat here. Going out and just doing won't inherently lead to you finding settings you didn't know about and using them. I find reviews, videos, technique breakdowns FAR more valuable because they can cover every feature or use settings I'd never try or even figure out.

[–] Fineus@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's almost about... knowing there's a time to practice and experiment and make mistakes, and there's a time to search out learning resources on the internet that'll answer some niggling question or provide some vital tip in seconds.

Youtube taught me some amazing software editing tips that would've taken me a lot longer by experimenting and making mistakes, but getting out and shooting helped me learn what I liked to shoot far more than any Instagram "Instead of this, try this" stuff.

[–] lexshotit@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm pretty confident I would never have 'figured out' frequency separation retouching just by 'trying things out' in Photoshop regardless of how many millennia I put into it lol.

[–] okitha_irl@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

That's different. When you learn PS, you learn PS. Not How to edit pictures. you edit pictures the way you want.

But if someone goes on Youtube searches for a photography tutorial and copies it step by step, its not the same thing. They aren't learning photography, they're copying someone else's style.

load more comments (1 replies)