this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
37 points (93.0% liked)

Selfhosted

51865 readers
582 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
37
IPv6 & Opnsense & Not Exposing Machine-Specific IPv6s to Corpos (piefed.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by glizzyguzzler@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have had IPv6 off for a long time now, but it feels like now is time to actually try. I'm planning on setting the WAN side to DHCPv6 and the LAN side to Static IPv6 to match the IPv4 settings. https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/ipv6.html (I see people say "talk to your ISP about dynamic or static and what block size" but I would rather collapse into a singularity than contact my ISP unforced, so I shan't do that)

I've tried to read about IPv6 but I just don't have enough knowledge-ground to stand on to make sense of it in an actionable way.

From what I have read and (mildly) understood, I think I know that IPv6 addresses are directly identifying; no longer does everything on the internet see the IPv4 of your router only - now things see your specific device's IPv6 that's a... subset? of the router's IPv6 range (not single IP) assigned. https://superuser.com/a/1735921 People describe it as a different way to network, which I guess means no matter what I read I'm still not sure what to do.

I want IPv6 to work exactly like IPv4: router has WAN IPv4 address and masquerades for every device in the network. I don't want Google knowing exactly which computer contacted them from inside my LAN, I want them to put in the work to finger print my device with various ways that are likely illegal in the EU.

How do I prevent that IPv6 privacy issue, or did I misunderstand how IPv6 works?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My advise it to not bother. As soon as you need device specific firewall rules the whole thing falls apart. The evangelicals dont like this fact and will down vote me for saying it.

No one needs IPv6 in their home on their devices.

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, it IS a not very reasonable take that seems to be grounded in a certain unwillingness to deal with new and unknown yet things. How do I solve address overlap in RFC1918 and various VPNs reliably without IPv6? This starts to become a problem when I think about my self hosted music server accessed through a wireguard tunnel and I'm at a friend's house. Not too outlandish problem for the crowd around here, I'd guess.