this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

40445 readers
284 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The German high court now suggests that if ad blockers manipulate a site’s structure in ways that violate copyright integrity, they could be deemed illegal.

Now, I'm no legal expert, particularly not in the workings of German copyright law. But an ad blocker does not "manipulate a site's structure", so copyright seems like very shakey grounds for a legal argument. All adblockers do is block connections to specific domains, and then what you see is what the website's server spits out without downloading info from those outside domains. AFAIK there is no adblocker that is editing a website's actual code, but maybe some of the advanced YT adblockers are doing that, idk.

[–] zueski@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

The problem is even if the “structure” is being manipulated, the web site is freely sharing data to your computer. HTML is just data. Code is just data also, there is no reasonable guarantee that random code you hand out on the internet can run on what you hand it to.