this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
617 points (99.0% liked)

Work Reform

10012 readers
258 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (16 children)

I agree with the premise, but this rub me the wrong way:

"$16 on lunch, $13 on breakfast and coffee."

It sounds like entitlement if you think someone should be paying for something you already do at home (eat), but choose to do it in the most expensive way possible.

Make food and coffee at home and bring it to work. And if you're already buying expensive shop meals to eat at home, why complain about spending that outrageous amount of money when you're outside the home?

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I feel this has to be pointed out to young people: it used to be possible to eat out every day, go to the movies, drink in a bar after work, see a live band on the weekend, and still buy a home and save for the future. This was possible in major cities around the country. This was taken from you.

It is not outrageous for single people living in a city to buy food outside the house. I believe prices have clearly skyrocketed because fewer people know how to make their own food. In the 50s everyone had grown up during the depression, so if something was even a little expensive you made it yourself.

P.S. Not only did many workplaces provide free or discounted cafeterias to eat in, they paid you during your lunch hour! That's where the phrase " working 9:00 to 5:00" comes from.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

She is the voice of our revolution!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)