this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
774 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

87063 readers
4722 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 138 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Given Reddit's past unreasonableness, I wouldn't be surprised if this otherwise reasonable explanation has an alternative motive.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 79 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 56 points 10 months ago

While ulterior is probably a better way to say that alternative motive also makes sense given the context.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, I wanted to say that but I couldn't figure out how to spell it.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

That's what I guessed. Alternative is a fine alternative word though.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] logi@piefed.world 12 points 10 months ago
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The motive is these mods hold a decent amount of power on the platform that they wish to reduce. They don’t want a repeat of the API protests.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Now /u/spez will have all the power

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah that is exactly it. They didn't want mods to be able to disrupt the site again, so they're looking to make that more difficult.

God, I am so glad I left that place.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Gotta boost user numbers.

Or obscure them considering not letting people see sub count only daily/weekly activities

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago

That's it. It's the illusion of fairness and it takes away reddit jannies' ability to show off their powermod status, and that's the only incentive they have not to use sockpuppets for every sub they mod.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is actually another of Reddit's decisions that I'm in agreement with. Subscriber count isn't a very useful number, it largely just measures how old a subreddit is. You can already see how old the subreddit is much more accurately by looking at its founding date.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they'd added, yes. But removing it completely is just a way to hide how many are on the platform.

Or left in a protest

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 10 months ago

You’ve got that backwards.

Active users are literally all that matter. When a user is banned permanently from Reddit, they aren’t unsubscribed from any subs. They’re still included in the total subscriber number.

Showing total subscriber numbers is hiding the details. Showing active user counts is the opposite.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 10 months ago

Total subscriber number is useless, daily/weekly/monthly active users is infinitely more important and useful.

[–] ronl2k@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

The user numbers were bogus anyway since Reddit didn't automatically decrement the user number after banning a member. The banned member had to manually unjoin the subreddit. So the membership count was inflated with banned members.