News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
It's okay to be appalled, it's normal. I'm appalled too. But because of our shitty, two party system, you are basically made to choose between the lesser of two evils in swing states. Choosing to not vote, or to vote for another party risks this exact outcome. While your vote in your state may not have had a direct impact (I'm willing to relent on that for now), what you say online (Lemmy or otherwise) or in person can convince someone in a swing state to also be apathetic, and that's what hurts. It only has to affect one other person in a swing state, and then they'll also spread their apathy to other voters in the state. It's not a huge logical leap to consider.
When I say that you're apathetic, I'm only talking about your voting habits. I know nothing else about you or what you do. I'm also not sure how trying to show how this behavior could result in our current situation is "making it worse". I'm not trying to be insulting here, but if this apathy continues for the midterms (if they actually happen), it could very well convince some people to also not give a shit. I don't want others in states where it really does matter to see your comments and think it's all good to become entirely apathetic.
What really got to me was your comment about not caring about getting sent to the camps. Your relatives experiencing pain and trauma is one thing, but to experience concentration camps yourself is another thing entirely. You saying you don't care about that could also be seen as you saying that you don't care about the rest of the community being sent there, as well.
I'm not sure I buy the apathy contagion theory, I have a hard time believing anyone is actually swayed by me.
frankly the comment about not caring about getting sent to the camps was mostly being edgy to the guy doing the vote scolding like it even makes a difference now. maybe the Democrats would have been less bad overall, but after their past actions I have no reason to expect that Palestinians would be any better off under them.
my vote is a no-confidence vote in this shitty system and if supporting trans people becomes no longer politically expedient I fully expect that Democrats would cut us loose too.
People can be swayed by you without you ever knowing it, or even without them really even realizing it.
We can't ever know if dems would've been much better because we lost that chance, but the GOP literally campaigns on being pro-genocide, so we knew where they stood on the issue beforehand. And we got even more confirmation of that now.
Similarly, we knew that the GOP would do everything they could to villify and condemn trans people. At least the dems didn't fully campaign on it. Since you're in a blue state, I wonder if you have protections that trans people in red states do not? I sure do, in my blue state. The dems here didn't just talk about improving trans rights and protecting us, they actually did it, and have continued to do so. They did the same thing for abortion rights. Of course, not without massive complaints from the local GOP.
The democrats ran on a year+ of genocide, I have no confidence that they would suddenly have a change of heart afterwards.
The democrats in my state do in fact pass some protections, but do basically nothing about the fundamental economic and housing inequalities that make it almost impossible for red state trans people to safely relocate there. If you're someone who can hustle enough to afford to live here it's relatively safe, but despite all that we still have plenty of right wing democrats triangulating over things like womens sports.
And republicans have run on decades+ of warmongering and genocide. Invading other countries directly.
I know which one I prefer.
I would prefer they both lose, tbh.
Also Democrats have had their share of military interventions, and countries they destroyed. Their whole issue with Iraq at the time wasn't that the invasion was wrong, but that they would run it better. The genocidal warmongering is established bipartisan consensus.
Well, yeah, obviously I would prefer that, too. But we don't live in that country.
And maybe, but one of the two is definitely more "blow up the entire middle east, fuck all of them, turn it to glass" than the other, which is my point.
They are, and if I was in a position where my vote could actually influence things I would probably vote for democrats over that, but that's not the country I live in either.
At the lack of support for genocide.