this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
97 points (90.8% liked)

politics

25850 readers
4291 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think there was much against him for the 2024 election cycle. 2020 he was still some guy we didn't really know and he had a weird victory speech in Iowa when they had all kinds of counting issues and we didn't really know the results yet.

In between when he was transportation secretary I think we got to know him and how much he could dominate those guys.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

WOW THERE WAS. Holy shit, it was prolific. The Fox News crowd they'd have no chance against this dude in a debate, and they laid into that angle SO heavily.

Even the lefty people were turning against him, for no good reason. He's a good dude, smart as fuck, a family man, but gay. As if that's a fucking drawback. Insane.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Leftists didn't like him because he used to work as a managing consultant for McKinsey & Company...which is seen as a highly corrupt PR firm. In a nutshell, they view him as an accomplished propagandist for the Capitalist class.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

highly corrupt PR firm

McKinsey is a consulting firm, not a PR firm.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

Leftists do not like him because he is a nihilist Politician believing in nothing but his self-advancement. Like All of our establishment politicians.

He is as fake as Kamala and biden were and there is no way he overcomes the Party Machine in 2028 to take the election as vice president or anything.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hold on, are we even talking about the same thing here? I understood your comment to mean that the left was hating on Pete, who was never a serious contender for 2024 POTUS candidate, in that cycle. If that's correct, can you tell me what people did that would be considered "hating" on him? Not just overlooking him when the spotlight was on Biden and later Harris, but actively speaking negatively against him?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, the Progressive left commentators were hating on Pete.

Seder and Emma, those Turks whoever they are, Piker...they all have wavering things to say. Very disappointing.

[–] meejle@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Didn't one of those Turks fall down the Terf rabbit hole? 'Cause if so, maybe it was never that "progressive left" to begin with. 😬

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

The Fox News crowd they’d have no chance against this dude in a debate

Fox owns the venue and controls the terms of the debate. Just like Kirk's phony "debates." There's no fairness when the referee is paid for by one of the participants.

He’s a good dude, smart as fuck, a family man, but gay.

Yeah, based on that, he's a great guy. But the fact that he's former McKinsey is a dealbreaker for me. I've dealt with those weasels before and would support a former Goldman Sachs person rather than one of them.