We're deleting 'doors' as a feature. They just don't make sense.
— Melontusk
It's unsurprisingly one of those "can't say much about it without ruining it" games, but suffice to say:
It was very good and you should play it, but it was always going to be difficult for it to top the first one because you go into it having a fairly good idea of what's going on.
Also I just think this genre maybe works better with teenage characters than grown-ups, but that's just me. 😁
Currently in that "trying to decide what to play next" headspace... but for a bonus point, I think the thing I completed last was Oxenfree II.
Anyone else wishing they could buy the entire Steam Visual Novel Fest? 🥺
I picked up Who's Lila?, Coffee Talk, and Tyrion Cuthbert: Attorney of the Arcane (despite not really being able to afford to 😬) and wish-listed a bunch of other stuff.
I used to go to stay at my dad's on school holidays... I forgot my DS Lite there one time, and the battery was still nearly full next time. 😬
I miss simpler tech.
Oh, I'm sure they are. I just mean, if The Masses are going to try anything, it's going to be the easier of the two options (with loads of marketing behind it). :)
Yes, to all of this.
UX people probably call this "friction" or something. I think the fediverse currently has too much "friction" for the average person.
Whereas with Threads it'll be as simple as tapping the "Continue using Facebook" button. 🤔
At least we'll get a delightfully stunted Jony Ive product film out of it.