this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
150 points (95.7% liked)

Selfhosted

51793 readers
723 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Curious to know what the experiences are for those who are sticking to bare metal. Would like to better understand what keeps such admins from migrating to containers, Docker, Podman, Virtual Machines, etc. What keeps you on bare metal in 2025?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 103 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Containers run on "bare metal" in exactly the same way other processes on your system do. You can even see them in your process list FFS. They're just running in different cgroup's that limit access to resources.

Yes, I'll die on this hill.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (3 children)

But, but, docker, kubernetes, hyper-scale convergence and other buzzwords from the 2010's! These fancy words can't just mean resource and namespace isolation!

In all seriousness, the isolation provided by containers is significant enough that administration of containers is different from running everything in the same OS. That's different in a good way though, I don't miss the bad old days of everything on a single server in the same space. Anyone else remember the joys of Windows Small Business Server? Let's run Active Directory, Exchange and MSSQL on the same box. No way that will lead to prob... oh shit, the RAM is on fire.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

…oh shit, the RAM is on fire.

The RAM. The RAM. The 🐏 is on fire. We don’t need no water let the mothefuxker burn.

Burn mothercucker, burn.

(Thanks phone for the spelling mistakes that I’m leaving).

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

kubernetes

Kubernetes isn't just resource isolation, it encourages splitting services across hardware in a cluster. So you'll get more latency than VMs, but you get to scale the hardware much more easily.

Those terms do mean something, but they're a lot simpler than execs claim they are.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I love using it at work. Its a great tool to get everything up and running kinda like ansible. Paired with containerization it can make applications more "standard" and easy to spin back up.

That being said, for a home server, it feels like overkill. I dont need my resources spread out so far. I dont want to keep updating my kub and container setup with each new iteration. Its just not fun (to me).

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Oh for sure - containers are fantastic. Even if you're just using them as glorified chroot jails they provide a ton of benefit.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Learning this fact is what got me to finally dockerize my setup

Speak english doctor! But really is this a fancy way of saying its ok to docker all the things?

[–] arcayne@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

Move over, bud. That's my hill to die on, too.