this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
323 points (95.0% liked)

News

32501 readers
5687 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The person said "one of the reasons", as in one reason out of many. Sorry to be flippant, but jeez, people really need to learn to read.

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago (3 children)

But how can it be one of the reasons when her opponent was way worse on this issue, and all the other issues

[–] Soulg@ani.social 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because they're really really stupid but have good intentions

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago

I guess I'll accept some possibly reasonably sized portions may in fact just be well meaning morons. Which I don't really like saying, like I think 99% of people are totally capable and have to be trusted with making fundamental political decisions.

So, by that token 99% if people are push to shove responsible for the results of their actions. Not the intent

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It's possible to be upset that you have no candidate who opposes genocide, no matter how preferable you think genocide(D) is to genocide(R).

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely it is. But if you voted for trump or didn't vote for Kamala you helped get trump elected whether you like it or not.

Wouldn't it be lovely if it wasn't a 2 party system where both parties are neoliberal corporate stooges.

But that's not reality and hoping for puppies and rainbows doesn't do anything

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

But that’s not reality and hoping for puppies and rainbows doesn’t do anything

Being happy with an untenable status quo doesn't make it tenable.

And acting like "don't sell weapons you know are going to be used for genocide" is an unreasonable ask in any way, acting like people who don't want to be complicit in a genocide are asking for puppies and rainbows? That's gross.

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I never said anyone had to be happy with it. I didn't even say anyone had to vote for Kamala. I just said that you have to live with your choices, and if you made that choice in all good conscience to knowingly not try to stop a fascist coup.

I don't really know why anyone is arguing with me, you can do whatever you want, I just want people to stand by their convictions if they chose not to vote against fascism

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I never said anyone had to be happy with it.

Then quit lecturing people for being less happy with it than you are.

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

it's a trolley problem. realistically, there are only two choices in the presidential election, and it's our responsibility to vote for the one who will cause less harm. I fucking hate Kamala, but I held my nose and voted for her because trump is causing even more damage

in an ideal world, we could have a real election and vote for an actually good candidate, but that is not the world we live in

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Why do people keep trying to convince me to vote how I voted in an election that already happened every time I say that democrats had no business supporting genocide?

I suppose it's because they never intend to change their policies and expect further complicity in the future.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

But all of you people who held your nose and voted for her are the reason why she felt able to run on a pro-genocide platform. If you all had more morals, the Democrats wouldn’t have felt safe running a pro-genocide candidate. (See the game can be played both ways when we decide not to blame the people who actually deserve it — those at the top).

[–] spiritsong@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

I think people thought by voicing it to her, she wpupd change las minute then they would vote. She didnt blink, and so these voters also didnt vote for her out of spite. And these voters still get to ctey "i did not vote for Kamala" for dubious moral high grounds.