this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
1326 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

16904 readers
1075 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blubfisch@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

How does composting paper make more sense than recycling? From what I can tell we have pretty well established paper recycling mechanisms, at least here in Germany.

Edit: typo.

[–] F_State@midwest.social 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In most countries, recycling paper only made financial sense if they shipped it to poor countries or used prison labor so it could be inexpensively sorted thru. Traditionally it was China, but they stopped accepting it. And letting microorganisms do what they do consumes less resources like electricity and less industrial chemicals.

[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In Germany the recycling is sorted at the household level, rather than the mixed recycling that is practiced in other countries. The paper, plastic, glass, and compost all get their own bins and/or bag color.

[–] F_State@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

When recycling first started where I live, we had multiple bins. Paper, and i want to say metal/glass and plastic. Plus garbage and yard waste. But I'm refering to the fact that paper by itself faces additional sorting prior to recycling.

[–] gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would guess that it's because recycling requires energy input, while compost doesn't require hardly any energy.

[–] blubfisch@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

I am pretty sure recycling does not require more energy than using fresh trees. You can even use the waste pulp to produce biogas.

[–] sip@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

recycled paper is lower quality, so you still have to add fresh paper pulp to it

[–] blubfisch@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

Sure. It's not a closed cycle. But if you need to cut down less trees, that is a win for me.