this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
502 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58173 readers
5364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago (6 children)

They’re somehow WORSE than duckduckgo nowadays like how? You were the search leader, people used DDG for privacy reasons but they passed you??? Did you forget why you’re a company? It’s because you were the best fucking search engine ever and you decided to sell that title for ads or some shit. Incredible how Google fell off the fucking side of a mountain they themselves built!

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

Yes, but have you considered, line must go up?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

For me it went from "great" to "usable" over the course of a decade or so, and then from "usable" to "worthless" over the course of six months. It's a remarkably awful trajectory.

[–] hagelslager@feddit.nl 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

And DuckDuckGo lacks basic stuff such as keyword exclusion. (It's my main search engine for the last few years after Startpage got bought, but lacking keyword exclusion sucks!)

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you can -something , but it isn't full exclusion. It's generally been good enough for me. I agree the full fat version would be nice.

[–] hagelslager@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago

So far I haven't had any luck with -something "soft" exclusions either.

[–] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

Yea I bailed after they nerfed exclusions and whatnot but not like the others are slam dunks

[–] icedterminal@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

It's pretty wild how Google search has degraded. The push for SEO has really ruined useful results.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 12 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Kagi is even better than DDG. Google is absolutely horrendous.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It’s interesting, but $120 a year is just too much for me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is ddg actually good now? I remember it feeling nearly useless waay back when it was first hitting the scene. Might have to give it a shot again

[–] jagungal@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

I'm not a power user, but I've used DDG exclusively for a while now and I often forget that I'm using it. I'd say it's a pretty seamless transition nowadays.

[–] Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You actually get the results you are looking for without the sponsored links. Sometimes you end up searching for reddit results but that's every search engine.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

Not kagi. I haven’t specified Reddit once since switching to kagi. It really is that much better than DDG and Google.