this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
476 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

13499 readers
750 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apparently pedestrians should take personal responsibility but not drivers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Both should take personal responsibilities for their actions. I had to brake more than once because some pedestrian crossed the road without looking up from his or her phone. On the other hand, someone playing around with his / her phone while driving a car should be seriously punished.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Pedestrians always have right of way in my state, regardless of legality. They can indeed step out into a busy road and it is entirely the drivers responsibility to stop. Ensuring safety in a shared space is always heavily biased towards the person who is operating a deadly weapon, as it should be.

If you can't be sure you wont kill a person walking, even one making irresponsible choices, you need to slow down, drive more defensively, or not drive at all.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Pedantry incoming: "Right of way" implies drivers have to yield to pedestrians, which isn't true — they just have to not hit them. You're still absolutely right about everything else, "right of way" is just the wrong expression. You're thinking of "duty of care".

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Yep you should be aware of people next to the road, especially at intersections.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Interesting. In normal places, people are not taught to be irresponsible in traffic.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Where are you from? I guarantee you it works the same way in your city and you just don't know.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I definitely know that we even teach children not to just walk onto the road like an idiot without looking.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You didn't answer the question, bub.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I rest my case.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No one is taught to be irresponsible in traffic.

What is taught in normal, reasonable places, is that the person with a weapon is responsible for the damage it does. It's a very straightforward rule.