politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Texas is sending their troops (National Guard) to Oregon to fight people in Portland.
The Oregon National Guard, State Police, and all county sheriff's along the Oregon border should place roadblocks, and refuse entry to their state by any out-of-state armed military or law enforcement entity.
California should also close off their roadways to Oregon. Make them come in from Idaho or Nevada.
If you want in so bad, try to shoot your way in. See how well that works out for you.
The truth is the voters in states like Oregon don't actually have command of their own police forces. The police don't answer to elected politicians. They're an independent occupying force that answers only to themselves. And they support the regime.
Voters vote for Sheriffs. They also vote for Mayors, who appoint police chiefs. The voters DEFINITELY have an influence in who operates their local law enforcement - IF they choose to exercise that influence.
In a past life, you were one of those folks living in first century AD Rome that thought the Senate still meant something, simply because they nominally still ran things.
The governors can't arrest sherrifs? Mayors cant fire chiefs of police? Officers don't follow orders?
Well I agree that is a bad move; it's authoritarian, violent, expensive, unnecessary, and most likely unconstitutional.
But does sending National Guard troops to another state constitute a civil war?
They are military forces from one state being sent to another, and the target state did not ask for it.
Does the US deploying "peacekeeping" troops to an African nation constitute war? The people of Somalia who participated in the Battle of Mogadishu would probably think so.
So it was a civil war when National Guard troops were deployed in an attempt to quell the George Floyd uprising?
The governor of MN invited them there, so no.
"invited" is questionable, I know my governor was pressured and put under duress in order to accept Trump's national guard deployment during George Floyd.
But what about a clearer example: President Eisenhower deployed National Guard troops to Arkansas to enforce the desegregation of schools. The national guard was explicitly not invited by the Governor of Arkansas. Was this a civil war?
That was Arkansas' own National Guard, and the Mayor of Little Rock had actually asked for it to happen. The school district itself was also supportive. So no.
Correction, trump is trying to take the Texas troops. Texas is not involved in this dispute.
"I fully authorized the President to call up 400 members of the Texas National Guard to ensure safety for federal officials"
That's Texas Gov Abbott giving the rubber stamp to do it. The government of Texas is completely on board with this.