this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
298 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

75758 readers
3056 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Well, it's also stupid to use RAM size as an indicator of a machines CPU load capability...

Definitely sending off some tech illiterate vibes.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Most software shouldn't saturate either RAM or CPU on a modern computer.

Yes, Photoshop, compiling large codevases, and video encoding and things like that should make just of an the performance available.

But an app like Teams or Discord should not be hitting limits basically ever (I'll excuse running a 4k stream, but most screen sharing is actually 720p)

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

You're right, they shouldn't be stressing either resource. Though my point was that referencing how much RAM is in the system is a bit silly when referring to a CPU being pinned at 100%. There is a HUGE swathe of CPUs with an even bigger range of performance that are all sold in 32GB systems.

I'm positive the low end of that scale could be rightfully pinned at 100% for certain common tasks.