this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Linux

48092 readers
1383 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For my phone, I use Graphene OS. What would be the best desktop Linux option to match the level of security and privacy that GOS provides?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gobbling871@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What security stuff/mitigations are added on Fedora that are not on Ubuntu?

[–] RecursiveDescent@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Looks like they do add quite a bit security features. Having SELinux installed and working out of the box being the biggest. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Features

[–] gobbling871@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My question is simple: Which of these security features are not enabled/present in Ubuntu that give Fedora an advantage?

SELinux has a functional equivalent called Apparmor that is also enabled out of the box in most distros.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Selinux is more secure then app armor, but more difficult to use. Ubuntu is also pretty secure, I'm just not as familiar with it. I mentioned it for the privacy but, since it used to have some Amazon bloat crapped bundled and telemetry built in.

[–] gobbling871@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I have nothing against your personal preferences. But maybe compare today's Ubuntu vs Fedora. It would be a much more fair comparison.

[–] I_like_cats@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ubuntu is bad privacy-wise because it has opt-out telemetry. The telemetry is not very invasive though and I wouldn't really call it a privacy risk. There are other reasons to prefer other distros over Ubuntu though

[–] gobbling871@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Not making a case for Ubuntu but even Fedora has opt-out telemetry.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they meant privacy. Windonical doesn't have a good track record on that front...

[–] gobbling871@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. GP explicitly mentioned security experts that Fedora employs and other security stuff that Fedora apparently has an advantage on over other distros. I wonder if they knew in particular what these advantages are because that got me curious.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read their comment again. The first paragraph is about privacy and Ubuntu is only mentioned at that point. Fedora's default security is only compared to nix and arch.

[–] gobbling871@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I used Ubuntu as an example for argument's sake not as a defence for Ubuntu's privacy/security features.