this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
5 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Football fans like painting new money oil clubs that are performing well as cheaters because they seem to be breaching FFP.

But on the flip side, isn't FFP designed to just keep the traditional big clubs in power given they have an advantage of higher spending power since they have more fans and make more profits to begin with?

If I were a fan of a smaller club how is that fair in a sporting sense since it will almost be impossible to catch up organically?

So do most fans like FFP? I'd like to hear from people who are not a fan of the top five to ten European super clubs (you know who they are) on this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bigelcid@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People assume oil clubs cheat all the time, when in fact it's just them finding legal loopholes. Which UEFA allows.

One needs at least a super basic understanding of law. Legal matters are supposed to be written, and taken, as literally as possible. So if loopholes exist, then they're not illegal to exploit. Not until the lawmakers plug the holes.

I find it funny how everyone's complaining about oil clubs now that FFP exists (and they're allegedly cheating it), but forgets about how Milan, Chelsea, United etc. used to outspend everyone through cash injections from the owners, when there was no FFP.

[–] Panzick@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Chelsea was trash before oil money arrived. abramovich was the first new owner who just arrived to some slower tier club, immediately starting to spend over the top moneys to get the best available players on the market.

[–] thegodfathersfather@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

United - injections from the owners lol