this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
334 points (95.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

37997 readers
1522 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We don't jail gun manufacturers either.

When a tool is used to kill a human, the user of the tool is guilty.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So when a kid commits suicide because the Generative AI LLM agreed with him in a harmful way?

Edit: In before someone says something about how the gun manufacturers still shouldn't be held accountable.

Gen AI LLM's in this instance are products working as intended/designed, and are being used in a way that the manufacturer knows is harmful and admits is damaging. They also admit that there are no laws to safeguard persons against how the AI is designed, implemented etc and these things don't even have warning labels.

Guns by contrast have lots of laws involving how and where they can be sold and accessed, as well as by whom, and with respect to informing the user of the dangers. You don't sign a EULA or a TOS when you buy a gun, waiving your rights to sue. You don't agree to only arbitration.

[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If a child shot themself, I'd blame the parents.

Keep 'em coming. I can do this all day.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I'll agree with you there, I shot myself in the arm when I was only 3 with a pellet gun. My dad realized his mistake and kept all guns away from me, until age 10, when he took me out to shoot some bottles and cans, and teach me proper gun safety.

Yes that might have been an earlier childhood lesson than many parents might agree to, but he was proper about what and when he taught me. Like, aside from the obvious of keep the gun on safety and never point it at anyone or anything unless you intend to use it, who thinks of things like, don't lean on a rifle with the barrel in the dirt? The dirt can and will clog the barrel and cause the gun to explode!

Anyways, back on point of AI...

Most parents aren't just up and giving their kids guns, but major corporations are shoving this AI shit up everyone's asses, as much as they can anyways, knowing good and well that one AI model says 1+2+3=15 and another AI model is suggesting people suffering pain to use heroin...

So what's the answer, avoid AI? Well fuck Google then.....

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They knew what I meant and chose to ignore the meaning to avoid the question.

[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why can guns be something that can be responsibly used but AI cannot?

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One can simply decide to never use a gun.

You don't get that option with AI these days if you simply want to Google something, they force you to use it. Google, Alexa, Siri, fuck our own US government is now using Grok!

[–] NewPerspective@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is the gun in the metaphor held to your head? Google... Or else?

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

More or less yeah.

[–] NewPerspective@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are so close to getting it...

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Okay, I'll bite.

What am I missing here NewPerspective?

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

When a human dies because a tool was designed with needless danger, the manufacturer is often prosecuted.

But again, I think you're missing the point.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We don't jail gun manufacturers either.

Be a lot cooler if you did

[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

When guns have no legal uses, this is a direction we should go. Until then, this holds people accountable for other people misusing their product.

In a chain of responsibility, the last person who's accountable should be punished, not the first.