this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
202 points (87.1% liked)

politics

26172 readers
4280 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Feel this is a good accompanying piece for all the folk insisting on caping for a Blackwater merc wth a nazi tattoo because he said something they liked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hegseth has shitty tattoos but we talk about him leaking chats, shit policy, chastising the troops, being a sloppy drunk. Lots of REAL reasons to dislike Hegseth.

But this guy... people just bring up his tattoos?

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...

No, people very much do point out hegseth is a nazi. It is just the rationale behind his evil acts.

In the case of platner? We very much do point out his history of homophobic comments (at least as recent as 2020) and that he is a fucking Blackwater merc. It is just that he isn't in power to enact a nazi ideology so we instead focus on "Yo dog, muhfugger is a nazi and we have seen how poorly that ends"

[–] brognak@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I don't think people do talk about Hogsbreath being a Nazi, but it's because he's MAGA so it's more or less assumed. Why argue about if he's a Nazi when not many will disagree? Leads to attacking on policy, which is honestly kinda convenient for him, and I am starting to dislike that we don't directly attack him for his tattoos even as I am typing this.

With Platner, he was already really borderline for a lot of people (background, specifically multiple tours then willingly signing up with Blackwater), so the tattoo is really just a final nail in his self created coffin.

Do I think he's an actual Nazi? Eh, probably not. But I also think maybe we shouldn't be voting in people who are "eh, probably not" Nazis. The election is also like a fucking year away, not like we're rushing last minute.