this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
198 points (87.5% liked)

politics

26161 readers
4365 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Feel this is a good accompanying piece for all the folk insisting on caping for a Blackwater merc wth a nazi tattoo because he said something they liked.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Do you think he's lying about having the tattoo already covered with different tattoos?

TBH I don't really care that much for the same reason I didn't care about 1970s Joe Biden fighting desegregation: people can change.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 hours ago

Nothing in this article suggests any new evidence. It's literally a "trust me bro" article. wtf?

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Say what you will about Hasan, I think his take on the tattoo is spot on. Regardless of whether or not he has or had Nazi sympathies, it shows a just complete incompetence in how the campaign was run and he's just a liability to progressive movements.

If he isn't going to take his campaign itself seriously. How you present yourself and are perceived in public matters and affects your ability to develop coalitions to push through legislation, especially on a national scale as a senator.

If I were a Maine voter, I would hold my nose and vote for him, but the next election cycle, he's got to go unless he really shows some maturity in how he runs a national campaign within the first year. Otherwise, start looking for and pushing a different candidate for the next election cycle.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago

I’m getting Fetterman from him

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Say what you will about Hasan

According to his own words, he is already supporting Janet Mills, who is seemingly antithetical to his expressed political ideology and values i.e. her being loosely pro-genocide and a neoliberal.

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Do you have a source for that? Only clip I could find had him also endorsing Susan Collins and was clearly satirical. The stream I watched had him not really sure how to react to it for a while. I think he assumed the skull was more well known than it actually was, like if he had an actual swastika on his chest.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

As Soulg said, the end of the video he did on Graham on his main YouTube channel is my source. If I recall correctly, he says he supports Janet Mills, states that she has a clear track record, and says that he's apart of "Mill's Mafia". It didn't feel satirical, but he definitely didn't have his heart behind it either seemingly.

It just feels hypocritical of him to already be supporting somebody so in conflict with him. Somebody who is as old as she is, somebody who is pretty unpopular, somebody who represents the establishment - and is also backed by them.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 3 points 9 hours ago

I don't know how he squares the Gaza stance but he definitely has said he is supporting mills. If you watch his video about graham covering the tattoo he says it a couple times near the end.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

You should vote based on behaviors. Not a skull tattoo that is only subjectively associated with Nazis.

He also clarified the situation.

What more do you want from him?

You want to vote for the person the billionaires and trump and Israel are pushing for instead. ?

Because of a skull tattoo that does not look like any Nazi icons or symbols. But that some say could be related?

Vote based on policy and behavior of candidate. Not on what others say about what type of person they think he is when none even know him.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 17 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Okay, what are his behaviors?

I know, let's judge him on getting a god damned SS skull tattooed on his chest 20 years ago? No? Okay.

Let's judge him based on having confirmed he knows the heritage of said tattoo 5 years ago and STILL not getting it removed? No?

Can we judge him based on actively lying to the people he is trying to convince to vote for him about said tattoo? With the dumbest fucking excuse ever of him being a terminally online military history buff who was completely unaware of the fucking totenkopf? No? Damn, you got some real high standards.

I know! We can judge him based on his long history of homophobic slurs and really shitty views on sexual assault? No? Well, this IS America, women and gays don't matter. Moving on.

OOH OOOH! Can we judge him on having fucking joined Blackwater as a PMC? Still no? Damn.

Okay, fine. Let's judge him based on his long history of community service and political activism. ERROR: FILE NOT FOUND.

Okay, fine. We'll judge him based on a few things he said over the past couple months and a long history of internet shitposting. Platner For President!!!!

What more do you want from him?

Honestly? To acknowledge he lied to his potential constituents and the American people. And to probably step down on this cycle because his very existence undermines every single "trump et al are fucking nazis" campaign.

I would also genuinely love for him to talk about how he was peer pressured into it in the military and that he was too ashamed to stand up. And then I want him to spend the next seven-ish years actually showing he has changed. Get those community service hours. Engage in political activism. Show us he is worth something.

Wait, why did I say seven years? Isn't a senate term six?

You want to vote for the person the billionaires and trump and Israel are pushing for instead. ?

No. I want people to fucking realize it is over a year until the actual election and there is still PLENTY of time to continue this primary. And... maybe they can consider that Smith-Rodriguez was ALSO a veteran who ALSO had a demsoc platform

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dirty@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

Hopefully you aren’t a Maine voter because you’re falling for obvious misdirection and smear tactics. Anything to keep him from talking about healthcare for all or taxes on billionaires.

As an actual Maine voter, I’ll be happy to vote for him in the primary and hopefully the general.

I suggest you go watch when a reporter asked Bernie Sanders about the tattoo and do some reflection about where you get your media and what your priorities are.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Priorities (not ranked) 1. Policy position on unions and living wages, civil rights, all the basics 2. Pac and aipac money. 3. Anti Trump's policies. 3. Integrity based on history of behaviors and current behavior. Especially including sexual misconduct.

Things not a priority.

  1. Appearance. 2. Gender. 3. . Ethnicity 4.. Insensitive costumes from 20 years ago which were socially acceptable then. 5. Tattoos up for interpretation of some affiliation (no evidence he was affiliated with any Nazi group). .

Keep your priorities straight.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

forget the rape and racist comments and tattoos which he keeps saying he did all these things when he was drunk;

isn't there any other canidate who didn't keep participating in war crimes for 13 years and still does not see anything wrong with it? giving him the best benifit of doubts, the guy is an emotionless conciousless psycopath. he will lie to tell you whatever you want to hear. people with a resume like his killed themselves from the guilt of profiting and participaring in shamed invasions and from ptsds of seeing civilians die while he is proud of it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Leftists on Lemmy falling for establishment Democrat smear campaigns is not something I had on my 2025 bingo card

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago

Smear campaigns are when you document someone having a Nazi tatoo for 20 years and never questioning it.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They aren't "falling" for anything. They are accelerationists actively trying to help the fascists destroy America.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hegseth has shitty tattoos but we talk about him leaking chats, shit policy, chastising the troops, being a sloppy drunk. Lots of REAL reasons to dislike Hegseth.

But this guy... people just bring up his tattoos?

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

...

No, people very much do point out hegseth is a nazi. It is just the rationale behind his evil acts.

In the case of platner? We very much do point out his history of homophobic comments (at least as recent as 2020) and that he is a fucking Blackwater merc. It is just that he isn't in power to enact a nazi ideology so we instead focus on "Yo dog, muhfugger is a nazi and we have seen how poorly that ends"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bottom line is that I'm skeptical of this guy, but this is my take on his whole deal.

He reminds me of a lot of young, infantry people I've met in my time: young and full of stupid decisions. I genuinely believe that he got a Totenkopf without realizing what it was. That sounds like something an idiot, young infantryman would do. However, I don't for a second believe that he didn't know what it was until recently. That's a bald faced lie for someone who claims to be a student of history. My read of it is that he realized what he had on himself and he was too ashamed to actually do something about it and instead tried to just keep it a secret. That is, he tried to keep it a secret until he was outed for it. If this is the case, he should have just come clean about it when it came out and just said this, but he didn't.

As for everything else, I'll extend him some grace on some (except one) post. Being a trolly edgelord is whatever. Infantry, especially at the time, was very sheltered from the military sexual assault issues, and war is really hard on someone. It can send you to really dark places, especially if that's all you've known. So, apologizing for saying stupid, offensive things and demonstrating change is fine. The one thing I am having a hard time reconciling is the "black people don't tip" post. He's actually defending that, which...is a choice. If he disavowed it saying that it's something he observed but is obviously untrue, then fine, but he didn't.

I don't think he's a closet racist or a closet nazi. I think he might just be kind of dumb. If he's elected, at least he won't furrow his brow and vote with Trump on everything.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 18 hours ago

What does it matter after he is dumb. Don't vote for dumb people as leaders. I have posed the question before what is worse dumb or evil and have posited that im kinda leaning toward dumb. I mean at least a highly intelligent person wanting the best for them and everyone else be damned may recognize how being a regular person in an advanced economy is better than being a king in the middle ages.

[–] tuff_wizard@aussie.zone 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like a true representative of the average American.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›