this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
43 points (93.9% liked)

Europe

7625 readers
595 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

It doesn't need a majority of people supporting Israel, just enough people who feel strongly about the topic. Even in countries where a majority of people are against Israel, millions do still support them and they may feel even stronger about it if their government is against them.

Supporters of Israel had a way to express their support on the ESC, while supporters of Palestine didn't, as Palestine didn't participate in the contest. So you only got political votes from one side of the conflict, while the remaining votes were spread out over any of the other countries. No conspiracy needed, although I will admit it's possible.

[โ€“] Goodeye8@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And in your opinion how much of the population percentage-wise would be "enough people who feel strongly about the topic" for Israel to get the most points?

[โ€“] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I couldn't tell you an exact number but I'd say that taking these polls, the 12% who say Israel was justified in everything they did would well be enough.

[โ€“] Goodeye8@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

And with 12% every voter would've had to vote at least twice with a portion needing to vote at least thrice for Israel to get first place. Do you think all of them are so devoted they'd all vote multiple times? The Spanish broadcast didn't think so which is why they asked for a full breakdown and they weren't given that.

[โ€“] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

And with 12% every voter wouldโ€™ve had to vote at least twice with a portion needing to vote at least thrice for Israel to get first place.

Only if there were an even proportion of ESC-voters across Spain's population, which I see no reason to assume. People with a political motive are more motivated to vote than everyone else who might not have cared for any of the songs and thus not voted at all.

[โ€“] Goodeye8@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I see no reason to assume the proportions would somehow be different. Or am I supposed to assume that politically motivated people are more likely to vote in Eurovision? I would argue it's been taken into consideration by the assumption that 100% of that 12% would vote. And just to reiterate, for Israel to get maximum points 100% of the 12% had to vote at least twice or more than 24% (and that's the low end of what Israel would have to get to be first) of all the votes had to go to Israel.

And finally, Eurovision could've easily silenced all skeptics by releasing the full breakdown of votes. I'll leave it up to you to decide why they didn't release the full breakdown (and no, it's not because it's a secret because Italy reveals their voting percentages).

[โ€“] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 1 points 36 minutes ago

I see no reason to assume the proportions would somehow be different. Or am I supposed to assume that politically motivated people are more likely to vote in Eurovision?

If that's what you want to assume, ok. I think we're past the point of useful discussion here, as neither of us can back up our assumptions.