this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
97 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
2850 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That bastard should be locked away for the rest of his life. Just like any other Google executive.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I agree with the sentiment, locking away executives isn't going to fix anything in the long term. Shareholder capitalism (and capitalism's need for constant growth at any cost) is the root issue here that needs go be fixed.

We go through periods of antitrust enforcement, but it always devolves back into monopolies/oligopolies. It's just putting a bandage on a gaping wound and calling it a job well-done.

We need real, systemic change worldwide.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the entire mafia of executives, the board of advisors and the shareholders (mostly venture capitalist firms) working together to screw over the public and make big profits. I totally agree that we need worldwide systematic change.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is correct, but I believe that the mafia of executives and shareholders is a symptom of the larger problem of capitalism as a whole.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but there are people running honest and genuine business, even in a capitalist system. But those there are also those who just try to fuck over everyone. Most corporations, politicians, banks, investment funds and others do the latter, not because capitalism forces them to do so, but because these humans are living pieces of garbage and should be locked away or executed. I don't know if it helps to take all fault away from the people running the capitalist system and attributing it to the system itself.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The honest and genuine businesses aren't rewarded to nearly the same extent as the corporations who exploit their labor force and their consumer base, and who lobby the government to write laws benefiting them.

If the system worked, then the honest and genuine businesses would be rewarded with more profit than the exploitative businesses.

For example, Nestlé makes more money by exploiting child labor and stealing water than if they didn't do those things.

Walmart made more money by driving small businesses out of business than if they were to allow competition from those small businesses. Same with Amazon.

We need to have a system that both punishes exploitative corporations and people, and also rewards the honest, non-exploitative businesses and people.

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

On what charges?