this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
58 points (98.3% liked)
Politics
11051 readers
10 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've been doing some free consulting work with Food Not Bombs chapters in my local area. The same day that SNAP went away, ICE started intimidating them.
IDK if this is a nationwide coordinated effort or unique to my area.
Christ, of course it's a deportation tactic.
We didn't end up in the "eat the rich" future, but rather "starve the poor."
Investors are going to love Walmart's next quarterly earnings.
Actually, Walmarts probably gonna be hemorrhaging money without SNAP. Like, they’re the single largest recipient of money from the program, by way of people using SNAP at them to buy groceries.
It’s actually supper perverse since a lot of their employees are on SNAP due to the poverty wages they pay. Walmart employees buying food with snap at Walmart is a non trivial part of their revenue.
A lot of conservatives argue that we shouldn’t have snap since it makes it possible for companies to pay poverty wages and not have their workers starve to death, and that without it employers would have to raise wages. Conveniently ignoring the fact that companies like Walmart would rather let their workers starve than raise their wages.
A tax to contribute to SNAP on companies that pay wages so low that their employees end up on SNAP is the better answer to the problem.
That's exactly my point. People won't spend SNAP at Walmart, they'll cancel Prime and all other streaming services. Something's gotta give, and even HEB is raising prices by 25%-50%. Like, how is the line supposed to go up when people can't afford your products?
We're going to see a bunch of fools parted with their money.
"Pay them enough to buy food? Pshaw."